RE:The case against 232The writer seems to not get the full picture. Seems not to understand that those hundreds of workers won’t have jobs anyways if there is no uranium being purchased. Certainly with miners curtailing even ceasing mining operations he must understand the price of uranium is going up, and markedly 232 or not. He doesn’t seem to address the concept that the price of uranium itself is not the critical component of a utilities or even the end users concerns. 20% of America’s power is nuclear, that will continue even grow as a percentage regardless of the price of uranium, far more important is that there is any available for purchase as available supply dries up.