GREY:MYMMF - Post by User
Comment by
BadgerMeon Jan 08, 2019 3:17pm
54 Views
Post# 29202043
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hows that Australia project coming along...?
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hows that Australia project coming along...?My understanding is (at least before the new guidelines were implemented, although that should be irrelevant as they both applied long before) that it is a two step process.
Once the LP is issued, clones received, and gorwing cycle complete, then HC inspects/tests crop for mold, bugs, pesticides, etc and if all goes well....issues the LS.
I think after the Aphria scam transpired, HC has gotten tighter and done more in depth due diligence. It cant look good on them to have issued an LP to a company practicing less than ethical business practices.
From what Ive read, MYM had an issue with a director that had a criminal background. Ive also read that every time a new director is onboarded, the application is put back to the background check phase. With the constant juggling of directors this could be a reason. Although I cant confrim if this is true, it seems logical any new director would have to be vetted.
Can we at least agree that management has somewhat dropped the ball?