Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

MYM Nutraceuticals Inc MYMMF

MYM Nutraceuticals Inc is a Canada based company engaged in the business of acquiring and developing natural remedies. The company is focused on the medical marijuana business by producing cannabis growing facilities and products.


GREY:MYMMF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by BadgerMeon Jan 08, 2019 3:17pm
54 Views
Post# 29202043

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hows that Australia project coming along...?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hows that Australia project coming along...?My understanding is (at least before the new guidelines were implemented, although that should be irrelevant as they both applied long before)  that it is a two step process.  

Once the LP is issued, clones received, and gorwing cycle complete, then HC inspects/tests crop for mold, bugs, pesticides, etc and if all goes well....issues the LS.

I think after the Aphria scam transpired, HC has gotten tighter and done more in depth due diligence.  It cant look good on them to have issued an LP to a company practicing less than ethical business practices.

From what Ive read, MYM had an issue with a director that had a criminal background.  Ive also read that every time a new director is onboarded, the application is put back to the background check phase.  With the constant juggling of directors this could be a reason. Although I cant confrim if this is true, it seems logical any new director would have to be vetted. 

Can we at least agree that management has somewhat dropped the ball?
Bullboard Posts