Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

NuLegacy Gold Corp V.NUG

Alternate Symbol(s):  NULGF

NuLegacy Gold Corporation is a Canada-based exploration company focused on exploring for high-grade Carlin-style gold deposits on its premier 108 sq. km (42 sq. mile) district scale Red Hill property. The Red Hill is on trend/adjacent to three of Nevada Gold Mines' Carlin-type gold mines; the Pipeline, Cortez, and GoldrushII. Its Red Hill Property is located in the Cortez Gold Trend of north-central Nevada, United States (US). The Red Hill Property encompasses a total of 1,363 unpatented lode mining claims covering approximately 108 square kilometers (km2), of which 881 mining claims totaling approximately 68 km2 are owned, subject to certain underlying royalties, 100% by NuLegacy Gold Corporation and 482 claims comprising approximately 40 km2 are 100% controlled by NuLegacy pursuant to the Idaho Lease. Its Rift Anticline drill target (approximately 10 km2 within the 108 sq. km Red Hill property) has favorable Carlin-type gold system geology located within Nevada's Cortez gold complex.


TSXV:NUG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by BillSmith9on Jan 15, 2019 1:59pm
84 Views
Post# 29234961

In General, ...if one can generalize, results are due

In General, ...if one can generalize, results are dueI am surprised.  I went back about 4 years.  There were several occasions when fall results were announced as late as February 7th.  But when they were announced that late, there had been preliminary results released, usually in December.

There's likely nothing amiss, but investors only like suprises that exceed expectations.  It likely is a result of late permits, mid Nov.  Through year end, snow didn't seem to be a factor.  Then I quit checking.

January is half over.  To avoid surprises, you set expecations & explain.
Bullboard Posts