RE:RE:RE:RE:Lots of Advancements in R&D and Isn’t it obvious, what they modified was the parties named under order and the length of time of the order. Think about your interpretation, if BCSC is choosing to extend the order against the relevant Bridgemark parties for wrongdoing related to their purchase and sale of securities, why would they let them continue to sell some of the securities that they acquired in relation to the alleged wrongdoing? How would it make sense that they are prevented from continuing wrongdoing against only the 4 issuers (companies) that continue to be prohibited under the order because those 4 may have participated in the same wrongdoing, and yet let them potentially do more harm against issuers that are now released from the investigation? Think. And even if you come up with a weird opinion or argument to the contrary, you can’t ignore what they said, which is not how you’ve interpreted it.
CanadaCoin wrote: "The relevant Bridgemark parties can’t buy or sell the remaining 30,000,000 shares since the BCSC extended the order against them." Yes, the order was extended to April 2019, but why are you choosing to ignore the fact that the BCSC also "modified" the order??
Please refer back to my original post on this subject for further clarification. If I am wrong in this....I'll admit it. But you have posted nothing from the report to properly refute me.
Cashmeousside wrote: itwillgo1 wrote: Mary do you know if the remaining 30,000,000 shares issued as part of the "consulting agreement" are still available to trade by Bridegemark?
The relevant Bridgemark parties can’t buy or sell the remaining 30,000,000 shares since the BCSC extended the order against them. CanadaCoin wants you to believe that Bridgemark can dump these shares and are only restricted from the 4 companies that are still under investigation, but he completely misinterpreted BCSC’s wording (or is just confusing you on purpose, either/or). They’re restricted from buying or selling shares issues under the consultant exemption of any company under the CSE, which includes those 30,000,000. PREV is suing those Bridgemark parties so they can’t dump them, and that’s a separate action, but the fact that the BCSC is temporarily ordering them not to touch those shares suggests they have reason to believe those Bridgemark members committed wrongdoing, making chances good that PREV will win against them and Bridgemark will have to return them to PREV. Until that happens, they’re locked down.