Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gunnison Copper Corp T.GCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  GCUMF

Gunnison Copper Corp., formerly Excelsior Mining Corp., is a copper development company. The Company operates in Cochise County, Arizona, and is focused on delivering pure copper cathode into the United States domestic supply chain. The Company’s projects include Gunnison Copper Project, the Johnson Camp Mine, and a portfolio of exploration projects, including the Peabody Sill and the Strong and Harris deposits, in Cochise County, Arizona. The Strong and Harris copper-zinc-silver deposit is located just 1.3 miles (2.4 kilometers) north of Gunnison Copper’s Johnson Camp SX-EW facility. The Gunnison Project which incorporates a large open pit of predominantly copper oxide mineralization approximately two kilometers south of Johnson Camp Mine (JCM). The Project is a copper cathode and is designed to produce around 167 million pounds of copper cathode annually.


TSX:GCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by ArizonaBillyon Feb 02, 2019 2:15pm
122 Views
Post# 29310323

RE:Situ Fact

RE:Situ FactI remember seeking this article in mining.com about three years ago.   So it's not "new" news in the true sense but is still a valid presentation.  Mr. Sutton makes a strong case for the feasibility of in-situ leaching.  

Dispite periodic questioning about ISL, no one, on this board at least, has shown any scientific evidence that ISL won't work.  So far, it seems to be working just fine in Florence.

The only in-situ risk I see is if the ore body underground is not as fractured as the thousands of core samples indicate.

The solution has to flow through fractured rock much as water flows through a glass with ice cubes.  If the solution encounters solid rock, as opposed to fractured, the solution is going nowhere.  According to the thousands of core samples taken from the North Star deposit I don't think we have to worry about that.

By the way, the map of tne entire Excelsior land holding indicates that North Star takes up only a small portion of the land footprint.  It is my understanding that other areas contained within the total holding are also fractured and are conducive to ISL.  These areas of the property could be opened up to copper recovery in the future.

As always, everyone is encouraged to do their own due diligence.


Bullboard Posts