Invictus MD Strategies Corp IVITF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:same old song and dance.

[Tigerwoods3672]

run33 wrote:

Tigerwoods3672 wrote:

run33 wrote:

Tigerwoods3672 wrote: I dont disagree with you on those things and its potential.  But you forgot to mention in all the NON positive things that keep this company going that GENE SIMMONS is making this company a laughing stock NOT a real stock to investors eyes.  Let him have stock in the comapny sure but get that goof out of the picture on him promoting this company.  This has to end he is tainting this company and making it look real terrible in the eyes of other investors.

Gene Simmons is your concern? 

Amazing.
 

For a junior Marijuanna company, giving him 10 million dollars in stock doesn't concern you?  Also look how much the CEO makes compared to the rest of the CEO's in other companies.
 

Yes, that was a stupid move paying that much for Gene but what's done is done and the stock price is stupidly cheap for it. Probably one of the reasons Dan K was shown the exit as CEO, but perhaps if we can get Gene to ring the opening bell for us on the NASDAQ that would provide some giddyup? He owes us 50 appearances so might as  well use it.

As far as our new CEO, how do you know how much he makes? No information has been yet published on George K since Dan K was given the boot. 

If George executes how I think he's going to, I could really give a rat's azz what he gets paid, because I will get paid.

NO! Dont ring that f'in bell.  Just get Gene Simmons out of the picture and this company will be do a whole lot better.

I dont have any exact numbers but do you really think that the salary for Dan K. vs George K actually changed?