RE:RE:RE:RE:Correct me if im wrong?mozzarella wrote: Independant investigations have been proven wrong in history. I think that these aligations should have come out when Sean was able to give his side of the story through the court system. It is irelavent what someone says until charged in a court of law. This itself as EVERYONE ON HERE witnessed this morning a sell off without Sean allowed to tell his side of the story. PERFECT SHORT SELLER SCENARIO :) LeafRider wrote: "I've seen this before..." statements do not apply in most cases. Your speculating while I'd rather go based on an independant investigation... The world is built around casting doubt on things and denail of wrong doing. Sean Dollinger can take his shares and dump them if he likes, there will be buyers waiting for these shares. I'd rather have someone with good intentions running the business for shareholders, than someone interested in himself first and foremost. Good things can come from firing the A$$hole in the room! JMHO ------------------
mozzarella wrote: Its possible? He was set up and innocent and this could flip 360 degrees? I've seen this before " when money is to be made " then comes out the shady people :) Next thing someone will say Sean cheated on his woman? ........ mozzarella wrote: So the committee of board of directors fires Sean Dollinger? Because of what the Citron Research said? So how do we no Citron Research proof is actual 100% correct? To bad Dollinger didnt immediately come on live and defend himself! He should have if hes not guilty?
the board investigated based on what the short seller said and found evidence of wrongdoing and acted appropriately. period. It is your prerogative to continue to defend Dollfinger no matter what the evidence indicates. I choose not to be OBLIVIOUS TO THE OBVIOUS