RE:RollbackThanks guys. I am encouraged by Fitz's comment, that the ratio is not set in concrete. I haven't see the exact wording of the motion, but I would be surprised if it was completely binding as regards the ratio. If it is, I guess they could amend it at the next meeting.
There is also the argument that shareholders who did vote only had the 1 for 100 option. A lot of shareholders might have agreed with a roll-back, thought that 1 for 100 was a bit extreme, but being unable to vote on anything else, just abstained. But Fitz's info holds out the possibility that management may change their minds about the ratio. Let's hope so. One thing we are clearly agreed on is that the present management are doing a very good job.