Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

FPX Nickel Corp. V.FPX

Alternate Symbol(s):  FPOCF

FPX Nickel Corp. is a Canada-based junior nickel mining company. The Company is focused on the exploration and development of the Decar Nickel District, located in central British Columbia, and other occurrences of the same style of naturally occurring nickel-iron alloy mineralization known as awaruite. It holds a 100% interest in five nickel properties, four of which are located in British Columbia (Decar, Wale, Orca, Klow), and one located in the Yukon Territory (Mich). The Company’s primary project is the Baptiste deposit (Baptiste or the Project) located within its flagship Decar Nickel District (Decar). The Mich property is located approximately 55 kilometers (kms) southeast of Whitehorse in the southern Yukon Territory. The Orca property is located approximately 35 kms east of Dease Lake and nine km from the Eagle target on the adjoining to Wale property. Klow Property is located approximately 120 kms northwest of Fort St. James and 55 kms north of the Decar Nickel District.


TSXV:FPX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by AlternativeViewon Feb 14, 2019 3:52pm
47 Views
Post# 29366465

Capital Intensity of Baptiste Vs Tsingshan HPAL

Capital Intensity of Baptiste Vs Tsingshan HPALThis is where the rubber meets the road.  From the 2013 PEA, we are provided a Capital Intensity ("$CI")  for Baptiste nickel of $36,000 per Tonne of Annual Capacity ("ToAC").  This needs to be adjusted for anticipated improvements in grade and recovery.  The adjustment formula is:

New $CI = Old $CI   X   Old Grade/New Grade  X  Old Recovery/New Recovery
New $CI = $36,000  X  .115/.150  X  .82/.90    (.90 is my guess for flotation)
New $CI = $25,000 per ToAC

Working from my previous post, where I conclude that Tsingshan is planning to leach only RKEF NPI matte output, rather than use a flowsheet that uses HPAL on the entire volume of mined laterite (yes, I am aware that smelting limonite is not preferred and requires a different type of smelter), and using an estimate of $15,000 to $20,000 per ToAC of for the RKEF NPI process only, we can estimate the total $CI for the new Tsingshan battery metal initiative by adding in the $14,000 incremental ToAC for the new Tsingshan plant.

($15,000 to $20,000) + $14,000 = $29,000 to $34,000 all in for Tsingshan battery metal.

$25K + $leach plant costs fro Baptiste  Vs $29K to $34K for Tsingshan

Yes, I am suggesting that leached concentrate from Baptiste might compete well with Tsingshan in the battery metal market.
Bullboard Posts