RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ProfCI appreciate what you are saying here. Though I of course would not divulge things shared in private, my experience with the folks I talk to offline is not what you suggest. I do not believe there is an agenda. What I perceive is each bringing different pieces of information to the table and our collectively drawing conclusions...not all of them being right.
For example, I caught a lot of flak on here last September when I began raising doubts about Vic Neufeld. Some of this was DD (like how some of these deals were being constructed) and some were visceral (like the way he conducted interviews, and yes, the open neck shirts, gold chain, Rolex, and big rings) all struck me as too much GoodFella/Soprano persona. I was raked over the coals. In private, there were some offline discussions about who the key shareholders were (Andy D for example) and how some of these companies were listed (with wives and other questionable individuals in the Boards...BTW, all publicly available information).
Right now there is some speculation regarding who will be selected to the new Board. No “insider” information here, just some well researched and smart guesses.
Bottom line, I do not believe there to be a concerted effort to manipulate. But then, I could possibly have been manipulated to think that way. SEDAR is your barometer here. Anything material must be filed...as was the 28 Feb date for independent review and B of D changes.
ChrisMuller wrote: I disagree only for the sake that I want to see what these messages contain, and if there is a concerted effort to pull the narrative/opinion one way or the other. Short sellers use the same tactics and we consider that unethical. I'm not asking for phone numbers, personal details, or pictures of people's faces. I just want to see if there is a network of people creating disinformation.
No disrespect to anyone on here.