RE:RE:RE:RE:Midas Letter Interview Neutral, I'm not asking for trade secrets and the fewer eyes and ears on this stock means the longer we stagnate around .60. We get an update every 2-3 months with numbers like storefronts except I've seen that go from 100 to 50. Which is it?
I've seen sales numbers but I'm never sure if we are selling currently or in a holding pattern. I'm not sure if the labelling issue is resolved as we may or not be selling and no release stating it's been resolved.
I've seen Q1 for the permanent facility now it's end of Feb for the temp facility with bigger production but like JM said, we're no longer sure that is on time and it may be Q1 for the temp facility.
I've seen numerous big names added to the board and the team but never see the results of those additions in the way of promo or rollout.
I've seen countless beverage stories come out and yet the 1st mover and supposedely only one selling is never mentioned. WTF.
I've seen days where we are under 100,000 shares traded while numerous companies have come back from the Dec lows with 50-100% increase in SP. The best we get is a tidbit of news, a small pop and a settle back to .60.
I've put more photos of our product up on social media than our company has even though I've shared some great photography of our products to them.
We're not keeping our cards close to our chest, we're not sitting at the card table playing the game.
Look at the Midas team, they don't eve know the name of our CEO even though he's appearing on their show. Cramer didn't even know our product even though Jeff was on the show. He called it Fresca like.
This idea of not promoting until we are ready to release instore goes against what every other company in the business is doing. It's possible that is why every other company has seen their sp increase since the Dec lows while we stagnate again.
Not asking for anything more than what other companies offer their shareholders.
Honestly, I think there is more to this silence than meets the ear, IMO
Either shite or get off the Pot, pun intented.
Neutral2 wrote: Pung this is a startup. The more things Jeff can keep hidden from people’s eyes and ears the better at this early stage in the game. Do you honestly want Jeff to publicize the store count, demand, ingredients, products and sales that go along with each product to the vultures of this world? Do you not think a company looking to enter this space is going to rip off every single aspect of Tinley’s business, operation, strategy and even products and distribution channels? Once they get a feel for the market and demand that Tinley is risking everything to get into they will be attacking like the vultures these companies and even investors are.
Think outside the box.
Keeping these cards close to Tinley is their best way of fending off competition and not giving away what will make Tinley a success. Tinley’s management for the most part worked high up for a runner up company whom ripped off every idea Coke and Pepsi ever had and tried to put their own cheap spin on it. Feeding off the profits and ground work Coke and Pepsi de-risked and created. Now they are on opposite side taking a defensive position and holding on to everything we got while we embark on this high risk revolution.
For you to make informed investment decisions based on metrics like sales forecasts and budgets you’re going to have to wait until Tinley has a complete strangle hold on all aspects of their business. Right now we are hiding and keeping a low profile which is buying us time to execute on our business strategy.
Think of this way. A start up gold company is secretly mining a small parcel of what could be one of the largest mines in history. Would you advise they announce to the world what they are onto at this point? Or would you sooner they wait until they owned the entire mountains claim.
Later