Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

FPX Nickel Corp. V.FPX

Alternate Symbol(s):  FPOCF

FPX Nickel Corp. is a Canada-based junior nickel mining company. The Company is focused on the exploration and development of the Decar Nickel District, located in central British Columbia, and other occurrences of the same style of naturally occurring nickel-iron alloy mineralization known as awaruite. It holds a 100% interest in five nickel properties, four of which are located in British Columbia (Decar, Wale, Orca, Klow), and one located in the Yukon Territory (Mich). The Company’s primary project is the Baptiste deposit (Baptiste or the Project) located within its flagship Decar Nickel District (Decar). The Mich property is located approximately 55 kilometers (kms) southeast of Whitehorse in the southern Yukon Territory. The Orca property is located approximately 35 kms east of Dease Lake and nine km from the Eagle target on the adjoining to Wale property. Klow Property is located approximately 120 kms northwest of Fort St. James and 55 kms north of the Decar Nickel District.


TSXV:FPX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by AlternativeViewon Feb 25, 2019 1:02pm
63 Views
Post# 29409701

This PR is Excellent But Incomplete

This PR is Excellent But IncompleteFirst of all, the concentrate grade is higher than that achieved at RNC Dumont.  This is likely due to the finer regrind size used by FPX (25 micron) versus RNC (45 micron).  25 microns is better for both a higher grade magnetite byproduct as well as for atmospheric leaching potential.

There is a phenomenon called "passivation" with stainless steels, where a thin oxide layer forms on the outside, inhibiting further corrosion.  The flip side of this is leachablity and the implication might be the need for pressure leaching.  The finer the grind, the more surface area is exposed, the less passivation is a problem, and the less the liklihood that pressure will be needed for the leach process.

At this point, I sincerely doubt that they will spend much time working on pelletizing this extraordinarily high grade nickel concentrate,  just so they can sell it to the Chinese for SS production.  Battery metals, here we come.  Pelletization might still b e in order for the magnetite by-product.

As usual, we are missing some key information.  In several previous post, I suggested that the chromite might be better not floating, so that it would stay with the magnetite.  We are not specifically told this is ths case but might infer it from this statement:

"The high-grade nickel concentrate produced during the testing program approximates the composition of pure awaruite, a nickel-iron alloy comprised of approximately 75% Ni and 25% Fe."

Looking at the new flowsheet, I see no obvious place where chromite might be lost.  By deduction, if it is not in the nickel concentrate, it must have ended up with the magnetite.

Moving to another quote, on the next metallurgical steps, what can be meant by:

"Detailed evaluation of minor elements in the nickel concentrate and iron ore concentrate"?

If the chromite is with the magnetite concentrate, and if the grade of the nickel concentrate is so high that the previous trace elements found during smelting tests are therefore likely to be reduced, in percentage terms, to the point of becoming immaterial, then what "minor element" in the nickel concentrate might be of interest, particularly now that leaching is being considered?  Does this imply that I am right about the cobalt potential?

All in, my take is that Turenne might still want to hold back on letting the new PEA fly.  He is probably still watching the price of nickel and not quite convinced on timing.

Bullboard Posts