RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:TD Waterhouse CommentsBingo. It is sentiment, pure and simple.
And sentiment will change once RIPET starts contributing and then people realize that WGL is actually a growth utility.
YodaLayhehoo wrote: I just pointing out that the numbers scotia has out and most likely the other banks. Shouldn't be any influence to anyone. Take a look at this.
IPL 8 Billion market cap double ALA. ALA would be trading over $30 at the same valuation. These are the numbers Scotia has for them.
2017A 2018A 2019E 2020E
Adj EPS $1.48 $1.52 $1.29 $1.31
Price/Adj. EPS 17.6x 12.7x 16.4x 16.1x
Payout Ratio 64.2% 64.5% 80.8% 82.7%
EBITDA (M) $1,174 $1,245 $1,182 $1,231
Altagas Numbers
2017A 2018A 2019E 2020E
Adj EPS $1.19 $0.88 $1.01 $1.22
Price/Adj. EPS 24.0x 15.9x 17.5x 14.5x
Payout Ratio 82.1% 123.5% 48.8% 43.9%
EBITDA (M) $797 $1,009 $1,255 $1,304
This is from the same Scotia report. I'll highlight below what I'm talking about. Their price target are for a year out 2019
IPL EPS $1.29
ALA EPS $1.01
IPL EBITDA $1182
Altagas EBITDA $1255
Payout Ratio
IPL 80%
ALA 48%
Yet for some reason IPL is worth double what the ALA price target is. IPL is worth close to 9 billion and ALA is worth 4 Billion?
Is it the debt that everyone keeps talking about let's see?
IPL Debt 5.8 billion
ALA Debt 6.8 Billion
Nope!
So why does the same analyst have such shockingly different numbers for 2 companies in the same space? I don't have the answer to that. IPL double, double the market cap of ALA. Do those numbers look that different?