RE:RE:RE:RE:good read....Supreme The issue is not with you md, we should not be reading a piece with a grey disclaimer like this at any time...any info should be in a company NR or clearly identified at the start or in the body of the writing that it is coming from FIRE or a quote, etc but not in a weakly assessed disclaimer at the end.
FIRE is genuinely well established in the sector and in the investment world, there is nothing that big money investment does not know about this company....FIRE does not need exposure it needs to do it's business grow, sell and generate revenues which is the same for every other company in every sector.
FIRE is a top quality investment with top quality product, facilities, partners, etc, couldn't ask for a better place to invest and make big green but only if they get that high quality product on the shelf and the revenues in the bank, everything else is secondary at this point and will be nonexistant without the expected sales, JMHO....Opt
maritimedreamer wrote: Hey Opt,,,,,, i did not state that they wrote the article.... more like they hired a firm that hired a firm type thing where the actual writer himself does not own any shares in FIRE. I wanted to get ahead of those that would just say its a paid pump piece....... this article is not as much as a pump as it is actually laying out Supreme's results and future goals. All that was written here was prior knowledge... but the article certainly made it look much more palitable to someone who does not want to take time and read SEDAR and NRS. Again another interesting trading day.... when will this stock finally be let loose!