RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:News soon ???that's not what you said however. You claimed anyone could have bought it at the same price on Jan 7th, when Gillis purchased. That was incorrect.
Just trying to keep the board making factual comments.
As for posting, I am not the one with multiple aliases that bashes on other boards and has been removed by SH more than once for excessive bashing/pumping. This normally happens to boiler room folks.
I even caught you pumping up Mackieresearch under your alias KingKing knowing full well you are both posters. Ooops.
I also don't make delusional comments that suggest they have doubled the price of Tinley's shares because of the research you constantly pump. You also said you took down Reliq with your posts. SMH
In truth, I don't believe you own any shares in the companies you attack or pump, but that is just my opinion.
KingKong wrote: Jmgreen wrote: Not to get in the middle of whatever you two have going but I’m pretty sure he was just responding to where you said anyone with a couple hundred grand could have could have bought at the same price Gillis did. He’s referring to the price discount, you may have been referring to buying at a different time on the open market on a dip.
Yeah, but my point is anyone with a couple hundred grand could have bought tinley like i did for the "100th time probably" at 43c in december,
and Gillis was part of the company then, so don't be surprised when he becomes part of tinley's management that he now wants to buy over a QM worth of tinley! He sees all of the inner workings now etc.
He's basically getting a 1% discount for every yr he worked at Coca Cola, and that's not including any other experience, I think it's fair.
JMO.