RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:10 m of 117.9 g/t goldhillcrester18 wrote: SuneeDaze wrote: ** 20 m of 8.64 g/t Au (incl. 3.3 m of 24.1 g/t Au) * (released Monday, March 12, 2019)
Historical Intersections
** 10 m of 117.9 g/t Au **
** 5.9 m of 31.15 g/t Au **
** 7.5 m of 48.23 g/t Au **
** 5.0 m of 60.27 g/t Au **
** 3.3 m of 35.26 g/t Au **
** 1.3 m of 30.47 g/t Au **
** 10 m of 9.6 g/t Au ** ** 20 m of 12.35 g/t Au **
I believe that all these intersections were fairly shallow anywhere from surface to 150-200m. If the veins go below that depth and its probably safe to assume they do, grades could be even that much richer. I believe its common to have higher grades at depth in vein deposits such as Red Lake where they're now I believe pushing 2000 m.
That seems to be the typical train of thought for vein deposits. At least Archaen greenstone belts I believe. Gold being the heaviest element will be found in greater concentrations at dept...but then, what do I know?