RE:RE:RE:RE:Cash flow - Peter Bell - NewtonCross19 wrote:
Moulouk, Except if he got undisclosed information, you're correct and Peter Bell is wrong in his assessment about the cashflow. I like the fact that the guy is promoting the stock but I'm not too sure at what point credible he is. He joined the train about a year ago and does not seem to fully understand the separation process (nor do I!), but also seem to take for granted some elements that are not factual. It seems to be his own too optimistic interpretation. Is he paid by Geomega/Kintavar to promote the stocks? Probably. Is he credible in the milieu. I don't think so. Probably a cheap marketer available for barely nothing (or trying to build his profile as a credible pumper). Anyway, any promotion around this stock is probably good, but it would be better if he would stick to the facts. Cheers, Cross
Hi Cross: to be honest with you, I don't know much about Peter Bell credentials and whether or not he receives anything from GMA or KTR. But I feel that his last interview
(youtube october 2018 I think) with GMA's CEO was really informative and it gave a lot of new perspectives. I also like what he writes on CEO.ca. There are a lot of information to digest and as you say, GMA really needs to have some people discussing about its business because not much people showed interest recently. I think (and only my opinion) that Peter Bell is a very good contributor to the discussions around GMA.
Moulouk