Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Golconda Gold Ltd GG


Primary Symbol: V.GG Alternate Symbol(s):  GGGOF

Golconda Gold Ltd. is a Canada-based un-hedged gold producer and explorer with mining operations and exploration tenements in South Africa and New Mexico. The Company operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, Galane Gold Mines Ltd., two assets: a producing gold mine which also has the rights to certain mineral exploration tenements (the mine and mineral exploration tenements collectively, the Galaxy Property) located in the Republic of South Africa (South Africa) through subsidiaries located in South Africa, and a gold and silver mine and processing infrastructure located in the United States of America (the Summit Property) that is in care and maintenance. The Galaxy gold is situated approximately eight kilometers (km) west of the town of Barberton and 45 km west of the provincial capital of Nelspruit in the Mpumalanga Province of South Africa. The property covers approximately 58.6 square kilometers (km2) is part of the prolific Barberton Greenstone Belt.


TSXV:GG - Post by User

Comment by mercedesmanon Mar 22, 2019 5:21pm
137 Views
Post# 29525396

RE:Vote Yes as a Goldcorp shareholder is a nobrainer

RE:Vote Yes as a Goldcorp shareholder is a nobrainer
GoldRush110 wrote: I´ve heard alot of people wanting this deal to die because of Telfers paycheck and other stupid reasons. Yes I agree that he is not worth the money and been a disaster at Goldcorp. How much is really the 8million USD extra in the big picture? Let´s say Goldcorp shareholders would say no to the deal; The we are stuck with the same management and also have to pay Newmont 350Millions. The shareprice will be much lower than 8.5 which was the low after the Q3disaster. 

Now when Paulson oppose the merger its an even bigger no-brainer to vote yes. For me there is 2 good scenarios in this, Goldcorp vote says yes and then Newmont shareholders vote no; We are then in the same position like before the mergertalks started  but with 650million USD extra in cash.

If both Goldcorp and Newmont shareholders vote yes we still have alot of good assets but with better operators. If Goldcorp shareholders vote no to this just because they are angry about 8millions to Telfer we are stuck with him, the balancesheet is even worse and it will take years just to earn the 350Millions we are giving away to Newmont. 




Good points. I am hopeful of a No from Newmont Foster, at Van Eck is blasting the deal now as well (5.9% of NEM) Interestingly they also own 6 % of G. However hasn't said how they will vote. Nobody can stomach the Telfer package. It reeks to high heaven.-----------------------------------https://finance.yahoo.com/news/vaneck-shares-paulson-apos-concerns-163644150.html-------------------------------------------------------------------------This could all be posturing to get G holders to vote Yes, and or to get Telfer to lower his package. The theory is that G shareholders will be convinced to take the deal, by high profile "experts" saying the deal was too rich. It's truly the opposite. In the end, I hope G says Yes, and Newmont says No. We take the cash and throw the bums in Mgt out as fast as possible (and or merge with someone else).-----------------------------------I would also bet that greedy and incompetent Telfer feels some pressure to take a smaller payout, in an attempt to secure a double Yes vote. Doubt the buyout price drops. MM
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>