Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:quebec Goverment about to step up

[mick1888]

StkInvest, there are all manner of scenarios you could add to this and it all really depends on your views, whether optimistic or otherwise. e.g. 20k average hydroxide price, phase 3 (50k+ pr t / yr), faster uptake of EV, production cost (lowest in industry), top quality product (best in industry) etc. BUT, of course you could have the exact opposite, and there you have your choice, optomist or pessimist. Gamble or not, 'you pays your money, you takes your choice'. And yes, the financing does also have a major impact especially over the short term, there will be a mix of equity / debt, but this has a lesser impact the further into the future you go as finances can be addressed over time. GLTA long.... ;-)

mick1888 wrote: Bearing in mind I am talking about in five years, not next week, I base my valuation on profit and longevity of the product / company future. I do not really buy into the modelling based on a Hydroxide average price of 14k, and think this will be a lot more over the lifespan of the project. Also considering that the Lithium price has very little impact on the price of a battery unit (i.e. a 50% rise in Lithium only equates to less than a 4% rise in the battery cost), there is plenty room for improvement of financials. I do not mind being called optomistic on this, but to be honest, I would not be invested here if I thought otherwise.... ;-)<br /> Hope that answers your question

<br /> <br />

stkinvestor75 wrote: the type of investment (equity or debt) has a big impact on stock price. Example: funding a 400M PP at 40 cents adds a billion share or reduces the market cap by half. I would rather hope for a loan or % of TO, it would make much more sense towards a better stock price.<br /> <br /> Where does your 2.4$ valuation come from other than prior resistance point? Does it have any substance as per valuation modeling?&nbsp;

<br /> <br />