Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Comment by goldhunter11on Mar 25, 2019 8:55am
178 Views
Post# 29530573

RE:RE:Beta Hunt Lower Bound Resource Estimate

RE:RE:Beta Hunt Lower Bound Resource EstimateMerci Pierre for your correction!
15 years would be good enough for me, but 150 yrs would be something else, unless production is craked up to 1Moz/yr, lol.
It's good to have a checker around.
GH11
------------------
pierreg wrote:

Good post goldhunter11 with one correction to be made:
The math
4000 x 150 x 50 x 2.6 = 78 M tonnes x 6gpt/31 = 15M oz Au (still mind boggling)

This would last 150 years @100,000oz/yr production not 15 years @100,000oz/yr production.




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>