Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

UEX Corp UEXCF



GREY:UEXCF - Post by User

Comment by MegaMAxTZon Apr 01, 2019 11:49am
106 Views
Post# 29564001

RE:RE:RE:Work in progress

RE:RE:RE:Work in progressI agree with you noro1234 - but my point not that I am any expert that is for sure, but drill holes cost money and each and every hole must be thoroughly vetted. A lot of 15+ year old data is being used to define the WB property right now. Drilling for Uranium back then and not even testing for Cobalt at the time.

Results drive news - all I am saying is that one hole tested for almost 10.0 % Cobalt years ago. That is a global high grade result. Why and where did it come from ??? Just drill one hole in almost the exact same spot to confirm the 10.0 % was not an error that is all. Would be worth the money for that one duplicate hole out of the 120+ new holes.

But maybe they did and the fourth and fifth tranche will support those 10.0 %  values. You are likely correct that indeed a high profile comany/analyst is watching closely. But when one negotiates as a very small company with Billion dollar miners, watch out and must be smart and crafty and do not give the house away.

MM
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>