Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

MEG Energy Corp T.MEG

Alternate Symbol(s):  MEGEF

MEG Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company focused on in-situ thermal oil production in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada. The Company is engaged in the development of enhanced oil recovery projects that utilize steam-assisted gravity drainage extraction methods to improve the economic recovery of oil. It transports and sells thermal oil (AWB) to customers throughout North America and internationally. The Company owns a 100% interest in over 410 square miles of mineral leases in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada and is primarily engaged in sustainable in situ thermal oil production at its Christina Lake Project. Christina Lake Project is a multi-phased project, located 150 kilometers south of Fort McMurray in northeast Alberta. It comprised of approximately 200 square kilometers of leases.


TSX:MEG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by mr1derfulon Apr 01, 2019 6:32pm
263 Views
Post# 29566584

RE:RE:A warning

RE:RE:A warning Well if you look at Optimistic Eric's numbers using $60 WTI then you are talking 4 x debt to cash flow. Meg's long term debt is $3.7 billion and base cap ex is $200 million.. So basically Eric is assuming cash flow of $925 million and free cash flow of $725 million. Seems too optimistic to me. If they do happen to somehow generate $700 million of free cash flow it seems more prudent to pay down $3.7 billion of.debt. And q4 had negative cash flow due to the ridiculously low differentials. I'd rather buy Parex where they have zero debt and can aggressively buy back their stock with free cash flow and get Brent pricing.
Bullboard Posts