RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:'ANTICIPATION" from a Ceapro Private Placement Prospectus. There are no accusations of fraud. Are you trying to accuse me of something I didn't actually say?
Maybe I can clarify for you. If a company has a "game-changing" technology which companies are "extremely extremely interested" in and names like PepsiCo are mentioned and it is said that a deal will be done by a certain date (and it isn't), the level of interest is may be less than what investors would have expected years ago.
Is that understandable or will you resort to personal attacks? It would be nice to actually talk about the company without things devolving so quickly, however it does seem difficult on this board.
digitel wrote: billy4325, "At that time it had more promise as one could believe that other companies were actually interested in the technology." I sure hope billy4325 has his evidence in hand when CZO's lawyers call him because he appears to be accusing the company of fraud.
During the January presentation CZO said many companies were interested in the functional beverage and some of these companies are also now interested in PGX which is providing CZO with an interesting dilemma at the moment.
CZO also said during the presentation that it has now signed two CDAs with pharma companies for drying monoclonal antibodies. Impossible to imagine CZO signing two CDAs if the pharma companies weren't interested.