GREY:UEXCF - Post by User
Comment by
MegaMAxTZon Apr 15, 2019 3:53pm
119 Views
Post# 29629597
RE:Overall, I find the drill results to be
RE:Overall, I find the drill results to beAgree and suppose that maybe they are leaving the best results for last. Nuts they have drilled too many more holes around the Uranium deposit and not north past L20+75E. Open pit mining of Cobalt around Uranium not the best plan - a la DRC issues.
But maybe they have and must assume they have and the next batch of results will be once again be world class. And why have they not expanded the size of the " blue hand " on the schemtatic to include more of the "1.0% + " Cobalt holes ?? Bigger foot print means more area , means more LBS , means more attractive.
And what about the big gap further to the East towards WBE-103 and WBE-108 ? The remaining drill holes I assume will fill in some of these gaps.
Fine we are now becoming back seat " drill " where to drill seargants but 0.03 % + results do not excite many folks....
Will say it again , but believe it would be worthwhile for one drill hole - just one out of 120 + to reconfirm WBE-019 and it's 9.94 % Co - even though it is only over 0.2 M. How can 9.94 % Cobalt even form unless ......
MM
MM