RE:RE:RE:So much promise, so little executionThe CEO has put out forward looking information to investors which have turned out to not be close to actual timeframes (in terms of completing transition to the new plant, completion of PGX deals, starting of cholesterol trials etc.). I wouldn't be at all surprised if the "better than anyone" claim is an exaggeration to put it mildly.
trek01 wrote: dando127 wrote: The goal of any corporation should be to "create wealth for shareholders".
Exactly, that's why I don't get why they don't try the cannabis market. CEO even said they would be better then anyone with extraction. But they dont want to do it and are not explaining us why. Its a huge opportunity that why are missing on. Why they dont try to do CBD-betaglucan "functional" drink. Or THC. Shouldnt be so hard to do it at different location if they are affraid of cannabis licencing. Why they cant just licence the PGX to cannabis companies.
The company would get way more interest from investors and dont tell me that they dont want that.