RE:RE:MeetingMy background isn't finance or stock trading, so this is an amateur investor's view of voting down the possibility of a stock split.
EHT is a venture company with a technologically forward product that can be morphed into various products with unique characteristics. Disaster housing solutions, Africa (Ghana) housing solutions, California solar houses, Puerto Rico housing, precision high grade medical MJ grow solutions, controlled farming solutions, now a prt of an educational/vocational programme, huge potectial for public sale from box stores eg, solar, portable, durable and so on.
The product is there. It's configurable. It's been tested. It has major government eyes on it. It has UN affiliation. It is "underwritten" by EDC Canada.
THe above are all of the positives.
The only sticking point - the negative? No sales - no money in the bank - yet.
The stockholders know that EHT is on the verge of a major financial breakout with the announcement of the first sale, the first deposit, the fiorst major purchase order, the first seal of approval. Once that happens, the dominoes will start to fall in rapid order to secure EHT's place in the solar innovation world, and then the SP rises - IMO significantly.
The shareholders are banking on the very likelihood that the SP will be generous to them without the need to RS. If the SP jumps, say to $0.50, $0.75 or $1.00, the outsiders will still consider those prices to be huge bargains given the product and the myriad of applications, and will want to invest before the SP gets to $2.50, $3.75 or $5.00 at a 5:! split.
All it will take is that first tangible signed sealed, delivered, payed PO.
My simplistic view and opinion.