RE:News - Sort OfSure, drill 20,000 meters into an ore body and then build a decline into it to do more drilling makes sense, building a decline into an area where you hope an orebody might be makes no sense. Can't be bothered to go over the diologue at the time but certain if there were any
" haters " this was the point they were trying to make.
But it's just a " what if " it has no more relevance than if they put a picture of a mill on the last page or maybe a rocket or fort knox.
Let's get 1 good follow up hole into this first and then we can have wet dreams about declines after that.
Not 40 holes, or 20 or 10 or 5, just give me 1 !
Goldnboy1 wrote: Extensive interview with CEO. Out at around lunchtime Wednesday.
20,000m starting in a few weeks. No matter what.
Stage II comments - Two Options as long as the drill bits hit.
A: Drill baby drill - More CDD drilling from surface. Would require more financing on the fly. Sounds expensive.
B: Pause Drilling - Aggressively apply for necessary permits to allow for decline development directly into the discovery. Allowing for the next phase of exploration drilling to begin aggressively from underground from within the deposit itself.
Hate to be that guy. But to all the haters who said the exploration decline was a crazy pie in the sky idea when I said it was a smart idea. Welllllll... Told ya so!
By the sounds of it, we’re going to initiate that paperwork ASAP. Could be a pre drill result catalyst in the future. ;-). I love permitting pops! $$$$$$
https://twitter.com/smithweekly/status/1123588125652127745?s=12