Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Himey2012on May 05, 2019 12:18pm
95 Views
Post# 29712285

RE:RE:RE:RE:Financing

RE:RE:RE:RE:FinancingYou/ve been asking the same questions for years. The answers are all the same. The BOD including the 2 from CGN are all in agreement on how and when management sees fit to tell the story. The story changes. They now have an option to do either/or. An open pit OR underground. Nice to have the option, especially if one is cheaper. This makes FCU much more of a take over candidate imo.

Uraniuman308 wrote: When Thitty and Ross do emerge, I hope someone asks some very difficult questions.  Not the least of which is “you spent how much travelling and promoting PLS on the merits of an open pit deposit”:  and where is the accountability of our “supposed” top notch tech team that took this long to acknowledge what others have been saying for years.  A change in management should have happened long ago but this would seal the deal if we had a totally independent BOD...JMO

QWERTYUIOP wrote: before these dudes went down to florida to present ross did an interview where he said that they were going down there to keep telling their story but now the story has changed to a certain extent and it seems nothing is certain with regard to details such as how much of the deposit(s) is(are) economic so my guess is that there will be no more presentations until this outfit figures out what story is best to run with :-( 




Bullboard Posts