RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Peters again The CEO outlined what to expect in the Proactive Investor presentation. They are doing an awareness campaign and we've seen that beginning with the recent article and two Proactive Investor interviews. They also did the ThinkEquity conference this year.
So same as they've been doing for years? Has this been a good way to spend money in the in the past? What lasting benefits have they gotten?
Then they will hit the market with a number of significant events.
Heard that one many times. Here's a hypothetical question: if your girlfriend/wife kept cheating on you and after every single time she said it was the last time and would never do it again - is there ever a point where you would stop to think that maybe she will do it again? Or would this go on forever and you would always believe it?
They also hope to increase awareness in the US market and may use a step-wise approach on the way to NASDAQ.
They've been talking about this forever and are nowhere close. Maybe they could have before when their share price was over $1 but we all know what has happened with the company's results over the past couple years.
Also I'm not sure if there's a single TSX-V company which doesn't want to increase in size and get onto a larger exchange. The fact that CZO wants to do this too isn't relevant.
They have spent the last year building value given completion of the new plant and development of PGX. Next they want to unlock the value.
They've spent much more than a year on the new plant and development of PGX. So far there's negative value since the company has incurred many millions in R&D over the years and capital costs. If you have any 3rd party verification of the $ value of PGX, I'm all ears. So far the market (the best objective source of determining value here) seems to be giving it very little, less than they've spent so it's been a negative value. And sorry generic vague statements by the company's own CEO like "extremely, extremely interested" potential customers doesn't count.
Insiders kept virtually every share and option on the run to $2.50 and all the way down.
Not sure why you keep repeating this ad nauseam. You think it would look good if he dumped all his free/discounted shares after telling investors what a great investment the company was for the last round of financing? It's bad enough if any CEO starts dumping shares, but would be extremly bad in this case. That sounds like a good way to get investigated for misleading investors. Especially after the massive share price decline and poor performance on forward-looking statements at the time .
That, along with the desired NASDAQ listing and news releases concerning "tremendous value" in "many ways" may hint at the future.
...