RE:Aurora multiple partners approach. (Now it will work)From my personal point of view, it sounds as though Bats is trying to give Peltz a lot more credit than he actually deserves here. I believe it was always in play right from the get go and ACB just needed to find the right person to put it all together for them.
I thought this strategy was talked about here already when the Coke rumours first started up and people were speculating why the deal never materialized in the end. Like many of us said at the time, it was obviously that Aurora didn't want to lose control of the company, especially when they also had the medical side, pharma side, cosmestics side in play, besides the beverage and edibles that the other MJ companies seem so focused on.
So, this latest strategy appears to be nothing new at all. It's just that it's finally being voiced out in public as this being their game plan. Especially since Peltz might be the one to have all of the necessary connections to make it a reality for ll of us here.
GLTA
Pinotblanc wrote: Aurora's executives didn't come up with the idea of taking a different approach to partnering, according to Battley. In March, Aurora brought billionaire investor Nelson Peltz on board as a strategic advisor. Peltz recommended that the company not start down a path where control of Aurora could eventually be handed over to a larger company.
This scenario could -- and many think will -- happen for both Canopy Growth and Cronos Group. Big alcoholic-beverage maker Constellation Brands owns a 38% stake in Canopy and has warrants that could up its interest to above 50%. It's a similar story for tobacco giant Altria, which owns 45% of Cronos.
But Peltz urged Aurora's management team to remain independent. And instead of teaming up with just one big company outside of the cannabis industry, he advised Aurora to seek multiple partners across several industries that could be disrupted by cannabis. Aurora CEO Terry Booth and the rest of the company's top executives bought into Peltz's plan.
There are two primary advantages to this approach. First, Aurora shareholders could make even greater returns over the long run if the company achieves tremendous success as a standalone entity. Second, this approach allows Aurora to partner with several major companies outside of the cannabis industry rather than just one -- which just might increase its odds of succeeding.