RE:RE:Trulieve Dilemma I said that TRUL is a gem, they will be around for a long time and you will make money on this in the long run...trul is not entirely profitable as their expansion is costing them more than their revenues (lost 4 million total last quarter), so they are profitable on a revenue to cost of goods sold basis but not in its entirety. Nonetheless, they are probably the best stock from an accountant's persepctive out of all the major MJ companies. I am not bashin at all, just stimulating good conversation. I'd love to enter a position in trul, as I said, 5 years down the road this could be 60 to 70$, maybe even more. Their drawbacks are primarily operating in one state. Big time MSOs are moving into the state which will inevitable take some of TRUL's market. This has been on a constant decline since the financials and the reason I pointed out before is responsible for it. Until this clears up, heavy investors will be very skeptical investing in TRUL. This isn't a director's resignation, this isn't a lawsuit, this is the FBI, the world's most advanced enforcement agency subpoening her husband and potentially charging him with several felonies. But hey, to each their own, I am trying to help out here. This could go to 30 if Kim is not implicated, if she is, this can go to $4 per share. The markets are unforgiving.