RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Disruption Verygood007 wrote: Stupidity and inefficiency is clearly visible.
Which are? Name some instances please. And then I also challenge you to name instances where any other major player is not guilty of the same thing, or has done it better.
Verygood007 wrote:
That is why it did not move up. What was the need for issuing the debt instruments(high interest bearing convertible debentures) in a bad economic environment?
I already told you, to scale up, which requires cash. What is the big deal, how much is it going to cost us in interest in the next year do you think? Want me to do some math for you?
Verygood007 wrote:
No profits but management wants to pay themselves stock incentives?
Whose paying themselves stock incentives? That's the kind of thing they have to legally disclose, are you suggesting that they are corrupt and nefarious? Why would you do that? If you think the company is corrupt then I would sell and stop posting on this board. Please take your garbage thoughts elsewhere. Also there isn't a single cannabis company that is showing "profits" that's not the nature of this game. It's all very speculative still, the question is who do you think will survive?
Verygood007 wrote:
Only partial approval from HC? These are the evidences I believe. Why r u getting worked up? If u have other evidences to prove your point pls go ahead and explain why it did not go up. Ppl r annoyed with the company performance.
1) learn some grammer, evidence is plural, evidences is not a word. 2) see above points. don't ask other people for "evidence" if you're not willing to back it up either. The whole point is that you should stop writing inflammatory garbage without evidence.