TSXV:CSL.H - Post by User
Post by
Wangotango67on Jun 23, 2019 1:11pm
169 Views
Post# 29853846
FOCUS ON THE MASSIVE VEINS = EASIER DRILL PROGRAM
FOCUS ON THE MASSIVE VEINS = EASIER DRILL PROGRAMLet's reference where...
Comeco's drill hole P12 121 - with 200 meter intercept 1.63 - gram is...
Comstock's drill hole PR17 - 169 with 104 meter intercept 1.01 - grams is...
Cameco in the late 1980s, hole 121 hit 214 metres averaging 1.63 g/t Au starting at 12 metres downhole and hole 122 returned 197 metres carrying 1.04 g/t Au starting at 8 metres depth.
COMSTOCK ARTICLE - 2017 -
At the Preview SW zone, which hosts the current resource, Comstock has now released an ‘eye-opening’ hole of almost 105 meters at 1.01 g/t gold.
DRILL LOG MAP SHOWS A GOOD 150 METER DISTANCE APART
https://www.caesarsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/062017-previewsw-drillplan.gif
One can easily see...
Each company performed numerous holes trying to continue or meld these two areas
150 m apart and show a direct connection.
Gold all in-between...
But not like the 104 - 200+ meter intercepts.
Logical Analysis ?
Two separate veins.
AS SEEN ON DRILL MAP -
It appears Comstock + Comeco drilled on an angle
And still hit those massive intercepts.
WHAT SHOULD BE PERFORMED ?
Without a second thought - VERTICLE HOLES - should be performed to
determine how deep these two large Vein Systems run.
If each junior hit that massive of intercepts...drilling on an angle.
Then...perhaps more forcus should be spent on...determining how deep these 2 separate vein systems really are...In Quebec they can run 2000+ meters or more...
Drilling vertically DIRECTLY into these two massive veins...
Would determine the extend and true depth of these veins.
PUT IT INTO PERSPECTIVE ?
It's O.K. to chase the entire gold trend but what if more attention was given to the two large veins ?
Instead of seeking a surficial strike length...
Flip the strike length and place the strike length going into the ground = depth.
One can think linear above ground or switch it up...and think - linear going directly down hole.
SUPPOSE EACH VEIN HAD A PARAMETER OF
75M-width X 75M-length X 2000M-depth
75m x 75m x 2000 meter @ 1 gram
= 361,736 ounces ( only meant for example )
NOW MULTIPLY THIS BY - 2 VEIN SYSTEM ( potentially 3 veins = if hole 122 is well away from 121 )
= 723,472 OUNCES
ONE CAN CHASE ALL OVER PREVIEW'S 3 PART CLAIMS...
OR...ZOOM IN ON THE 2 ANOMALY VEINS...
MASSIVE VEINS.
AND...FIND OUT DRILLING VERTICALLY...
JUST HOW FAR IN DEPTH THESE VEINS RUN.
200 M WIDE
197 METER WIDE
104 METER WIDE
VEINS WITH SUCH INTERCEPT WIDTHS
HAVE VERY " BROAD SHOULDERS "
SUCH HYDROTHERMAL FORMATIONS SUGGESTS IT WOULD SUPPORT
A FAR DEEPER HYDROTHERMAL " SOURCE " INWHICH = DEVELOPED = THE MASSIVE VEINS.
HOW EASY WOULD IT BE TO MINE TWO VEINS
VS
AN ENTIRE STRIKE LENGTH OF 3 KM...?
HELLO.
IS THEIR NOT AN ADIT ON THE PROPERTY TOO.?
PRETTY SURE I SAW AN ADIT ON ONE OF THE, MAPS.
I would think...
Focusing on these 2-3 large intercept veinimg has more logic...
Than, running about the entire 3 part claims...drilling here and there.
Yes..I like those intercepts and grams from = North Preview...very nice.
But...
I think what's more important is fully understanding the true DEPTH
inwhich these 2 ( possibly ) 3 veins run vertically.
Could be far easier to define a COMPACT RESOURCE simply focusing on the massive vein intercepts....Could allow Comstock to shore up an indicated and measured resource with
a focused drill campaign that " frames the 2 veins " and provide their true depths...
SUM IT UP...?
What if these massive vein intercepts run as deep as " Quebecs Gold Veins " ?
What if these massive veins have paramter shoulders of 75 meters square and run 2000m deep ?
I'd be vertical drilling a few holes to test there depths...
What if the veins do run really deep ?
It would be a real " easy " resource to = define.
Far easier than....punching holes all over the map...
HENCE = regroup + reorganize this Preview project with a new set of, eyes.
Just an opinion.
Nothing more or less.
Wango~