RE:RE:RE:RE:RE: KO PUNCHYes, the odds are much more favourable for a headline result with the first cohort of patients due to the definitions that will be used for phase 2. Written and approved by people that understand the disease.
Macer
Eoganacht wrote: Given that the "metastatic progression of disease in patient 4 was unrelated to TLD-1433 PDT", and the refined definition of CR for PH2, "similar data to our PH1" would be 100% CR at 360 days!
enriquesuave wrote: The next AUA meeting will have the entire Urology world excited and intrigued. IMHO. We should have 30-50 patients data and maybe more with some 3, 6 and 9 months data. It will be real if we can get similar data to our PH1. IMHO
fredgoodwinson wrote: Harpos; at 27mins 40 secs into his segment of the AGM Video (in summary) Prof.Jewett states:
"There was a lot of excitement at our investigative meeting held just a month ago in Chicago.
The potential investigators really were quite intrigued,some of them very,very experienced investigators around the world who have been through many Trials."