RE:RE:Bruce Linton goneSurely to Christ no one at Supreme is seriously thinking of something like bringing Linton on board? Constellation didn't send him to the house because he was an asset, they sent him to the house because he wasn't an asset but rather a liability...he could run the company or make money.
I just don't see your angle on Fowler et al Trans, with the exception of it could have happened a bit faster for me as well but at what cost, like WEED and most of the rest? FIRE is not behind in any sense, very much the opposite of WEED, ACB, etc as they will be showing profit within months, as soon as they get the sales close to where they should be....Linton going now says to me that the losses are going to continue for some time and they need changes now before it is to late to make them and survive, with many others that are in the same boat.
We will see soon enough but right now FIRE is beating the rest like rented mules and when we start seeing sales $30mil+ per quarter the gap will continue to widen, JMHO...Opt
theTransporter wrote: Canopy shareholders and the board of directors were quick to make a change at the top when the company doesn't perform to shareholder expectations.
FIRE's stock price is far from delivering any sort of value for shareholders, many who are in a loss position. I would like to see the same reaction from FIRE's board of directors and shareholders in making a quick change at the top which is clearly required in this case. Stock price has been a pile of sh1t here and nobody is holding the CEO here accountable, regardless of how well we believe the company itself is executing.
I'm still here and holding as I strongly believe in what this company is doing, what is represents, and how successful it's executing. They just do not know how to translate that success into their share price. That takes experience. Bruce is that guy who can do that.
Exit Nav. Enter Bruce.