Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. T.KGI


Primary Symbol: T.KL

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd is a Canada-based gold mining, development, and exploration company with a diversified portfolio of exploration projects. The production profile of the company includes the Macassa mine complex located in northeastern Ontario and the Fosterville gold mine located in the State of Victoria, Australia. Also, the company owns the Holt mine and the Detour mine. The company's mines and material mineral projects are located in Canada and Australia.


TSX:KL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by westcoast2019on Jul 16, 2019 9:13pm
67 Views
Post# 29927476

RE:RE:RE:Sprott is pretty excited about Wallbridge Mining

RE:RE:RE:Sprott is pretty excited about Wallbridge MiningIt would probably take at least $250M US  or more with ES as a major shareholder to take it all out.

What about taking out Balmoral (BAR) as well at the same time. BAR has the adjoining property which might be an extension of the WM orebody.

Could merge the 2 companies then form a subsiduary run by combined existing management with KL as the majority shareholder.
That might cost less if KL retained say 51%+ of the new company and left a minority stake plus cash for the current owners of each of WM and BAR. Everybody happy then and KL then gets to add another potential mine nearby in Canada.  If they did this  I think the market would see it as posotive after a short while especially if  reserves are proven up to be mineable at current prices. It would tend to derisk the 2 junior companies as they would then have easier access to more development capital as KL  grows its cash balance so if WM-BAR proves to be a success they can skip a large part of the financing hurdle that they would have on their own. 
Bullboard Posts