RE:F/S MetricsVery good point. I don't know why they don't put in brackets and add date of caluculation the difference between what gold is doing now and close to 5 years ago. Close to 400.00 Ca a ounce. Then mulitply it by 7 M. Then to not update the resource after close to 5 years and millions spent on drilling with great results is a mystery. Then to focus on this supposed de risking nonsense is bizarre. If gold went back to 1,000 USA you close up shop and have a skeleton crew till better times. The China deal was enough to get us to better times. Flow thru was okay for drilling expense. How they haven''t been able to leverage a low interest loan with Glencore is also strange. If I owned Glencore and all I had to do was finance a 7 million ounce project that would cost me nothing to make Hacket viable and save a few hundred million in royalties I would seriously look at it. Saving to SBB a ton in dilution and getting a low interest loan. SHL since fall of 15
GLTA.