GreenFreedom wrote: DellTrader wrote: Now, I was doing some research based on what Tim said - he said "we can confidently tell you we have our first healthcare plan" and that the Healthcare Insurance company that they partnered with made almost 19 billion dollars of revenue last year and that they cover 1/3 of the American population. The three key words here was "partnered with", "19 billion dollars", "and "1/3 of the population".
The first clue "partnered with" suggests that this deal is already inked. After all, he can't falsely claim a partnership without actually having signed the deal.
With respect to the poster.
At no point in the entire June 19
th AGM Investor Webcast did I hear the CEO James Tripp say the words = (partnered with) as you state in this posting. I have previously listened to relevant sections within this webcast multiple times. I have also legally transcribed certain relevant subsections for a second party.
The first quote from the poster claiming to be stated by the CEO of SZLS, was provided mid-paragraph in quotations= (he said "we can confidently tell you we have our first healthcare plan")
This does not represent accurately what Mr Tripp said.
In the very last sentence of the same paragraph there’s an inferred quote which is given in quotations as well. In this instance there are two words = (partnered with) which are claimed as being part of three key words stated by the CEO. Threfore, the two words in question = (partnered with) are implied as being stated by the CEO.
These two words= (partnered with) are not stated by the CEO at all. These words were clearly and plainly not within the first quote, in fact they are not stated anywhere, yet are given to the reader as stated by the CEO. Accurate information about any partnership is a matter of serious importance to investors! Nonetheless,these two words just materialized and were conjured from nothing.
In the next paragraph the poster builds excitement upon these two words and now describes them as being a clue = (The first clue "partnered with" suggests that this deal is already inked.)
These same two conjured words = (partnered with)…{Once again,never stated by the CEO} are now presented to the reader as to somehow a clue that a deal (contract?) has already been inked (signed?)
In the very next sentence the poster continues to build excitement upon a simular word = (partnership) and writes: (After all, he can't falsely claim a partnership without actually having signed the deal).
This is seemingly presented to the reader as almost certain evidence that a contract with a billion-dollar company has already been signed or the CEO is in possible legal jeopardy! In addition, uninformed/unsuspecting readers are now with the belief that the CEO has stated words that he did not; that the company has partnered with and has a partnership with a mult-billion dollar company and has planted the suggestion that a deal has already been inked.
While it’s true the CEO certainly cannot [legally] falsely claim a partnership; it’s not for the reason the poster describes, it’s because the gentleman stated nothing about a partnership in his presentation as to be accused of a making false claim!
Regarding the poster's first quote; the CEO did not say = that we can confidently tell you. His words were ‘’I think we can confidently tell you’’. You leave out an extremely critical (and legal) part of a claimed quote that you posted as being stated by a CEO.
Therefore, the CEO of this company was misquoted in the first example by omission of his two words =(I think). Then he was misquoted by the assertion of the following conjured words within an inferred quote which were in quotations = (partnered with)
The CEO’s words and following quote on the Investor Webcast from the June 19
th AGM (slide 9) can easily indicate multiple connotations such as these few examples =
''I think we can confidently tell you that we have our first health care plan'' 1. in which we are expecting to contract with.
2. in which we are engaged in ongoing and promising negotiations with.
3. in which we are expecting to expand clinical trials from a statewide status into a nationwide status.
4. in which we are waiting for the results of secondary trial results before they are willing to sign a contract with us.
My purpose in this reply/response is to offer a glaring example for novice investors to never take anything for granted within this investing/ trading world when risking your capitol/money. Whether accidental or intentional; words, posts, EVEN QUOTES and QUOTATIONS can lead and mislead a person on a path of false belief and excitement, that great news and a rising share price is positively imminent.