RE:Re: results must be goodIf they were good I think he would have stated they were good and re-assaying them is needed to confirm. If they were that good even partial disclosure would have been good to provide. This is a delay tactic either cause they hit nothing and don’t want to let market know and will update market if they get good results from forest Kerr project. Not impressed with the latest nr. Aubrey I’m wrong but what ceo wants to hold back great gold assays I when gold is climbing very nicely. Leant make sense.