RE:RE:RE:RE:Court back in session?I was reading is it used as a tactic to avoid trial.. basically what you have implied.. "a fundamental objective of many alleged infringers in U.S. patent litigation is to prevent the issue of infringement by equivalents from ever reaching the jury. One technique for accomplishing this objective is to request that the issue of infringement by equivalents be decided by the judge prior to the time of trial. This may be achieved by filing a so-called "motion for summary judgment", in which the alleged infringer attempts to persuade the judge that there is no need for a trial on the issue of equivalency because the relevant facts are undisputed and a proper application of the law of equivalency to the undisputed facts compels a conclusion of non-infringement." However, their motion was still denied in regards to invalidity. So, its anyones guess what that means.. And despite the sales for July, market is looking at the litigation and potential loss and will most probably punish the stock price..