Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Theralase Technologies Inc. V.TLT

Alternate Symbol(s):  TLTFF

Theralase Technologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical stage pharmaceutical company. The Company is engaged in the research and development of light, radiation, sound and/or drug-activated small molecule compounds, their associated drug formulations and the light systems that activate them, with a primary objective of efficacy and a secondary objective of safety in the destruction of various cancers, bacteria and viruses. It operates through two divisions: the Drug Division and the Device Division. The Drug Division is responsible for the research and development of light-activated small molecules primarily for the treatment of cancer with assistance from the Device Division to develop medical lasers to activate them. The Device Division is responsible for the Company’s medical laser business, which research, develops, manufactures and distributes cool laser therapy (CLT) systems to healthcare practitioners, predominantly for the healing of pain.


TSXV:TLT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by newdaydawningon Aug 08, 2019 2:52pm
55 Views
Post# 30008100

RE:questions and answers

RE:questions and answersIn answer to #3. Without the positive NRs, the financing may have come in at 25 cents per unit.


tomchoco wrote: 1) Who was in charge of this prospectus?

2)When was it decided that the price of 30/35 was to be the number?

3)Were Pr's used to prop up the price and lure in unsuspecting buyers right before the low number was announced?

4)Is Roger's wife the curent CFO?

5)Did anyone at the company sell exisitng holdings to participate in the new PP?

6)Can they cancel this debacle and find alternate funding or lower the pricing to facilitate the maximum amount needed?


Bullboard Posts