Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Husky Energy Inc. cumulative redeemable preferred T.HSE.PR.B



TSX:HSE.PR.B - Post by User

Comment by makedonkaon Aug 12, 2019 1:38pm
66 Views
Post# 30018670

RE:RE:Scottie

RE:RE:Scottie
Scottie99 wrote: I think you would agree with me that it is a financial crime to post false or misleading statements on social media about a company for the purpose of influencing its stock. Isn't it intriguing that the company is also aware of my postings and can't file a lawsuit if indeed my comments are false or misleading?

Instead they filed a report with a Canadian Securities Regulator, who wanted to set a perjury trap that I could smell a thousand miles away as soon as I honored their invitation. I called their bluff at their office and followed up with e-mail exchanges that would be a scandal if released to the public if not for their confidentiality cover. It is why the company cannot do $hit because they would have to go to court and the veil of confidentiality would have to be removed to address the matter. All I have to do is to release all the documents at my disposal to back up every comment I made on this BB.

I know when someone is being $crewed and the Board in connivance with LKS is $crewing the minority shareholders. I happen to have insider knowledge of what is going on and I am calling them out on it if the Canadian Securities Regulators who are charged with the responsibility of protecting investors are also trying to cover up for the company rather than expose them in the interest of the integrity of the market.

cathychoo wrote: I've been reading Scottie's posts on HSE for a couple of years now and at first thought he was just some nutball.  But at some point, when you see the stock continually getting beaten down, it might be possible that perhaps he's onto something.




"I think you would agree with me that it is a financial crime to post false or misleading statements on social media about a company for the purpose of influencing its stock. Isn't it intriguing that the company is also aware of my postings and can't file a lawsuit if indeed my comments are false or misleading?"

No, not "intiguing at all. Just common sense on the companies part.
You give yourself far too much credit to assume a company not going after you is a sign of anything close to accurate.

It is more likely that you're just not worth the hassle and exepense of going after for posting inaccurate information. However, that is not to say that they will not reconsider in the future if you should make it worth their while to bother.

Maybe you're just a figment of your own imagination.lol




 



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>