Husky Energy Inc. cumulative redeemable preferred T.HSE.PR.B

RE:RE:RE:RE:Scottie

[makedonka]

Scottie99 wrote: I see you decided to pay HSE BB a visit after your tirade on OBE BB, trying to disparage Kherson for his defamation lawsuit.

Really? I think you need to go through my previous postings and read some of the infomation I have shared on this BB. No company trying to protect its reputation can ignore such outrageous accusations if it is false or misleading. You said they filed a lawsuit against Kherson for his postings on some companies in Vancouver and try to remind posters that they should not listen to him as a result. Meanwhile, you quote commonsense on the company's part in my case in respect of a lawsuit. You cannot have it both ways makedonka and quit drinking the cool-aid!

Mind you, it is not as if the company did not file a report with the local boys and I got an invite for an interview as a result. Why? I honored the invitation and saw the e-mailed report from one of their Directors to the local boys. So it is not for lack of trying if you get my drift. As for not worth the hassle, let me share a little secret. I reached out to some analysts that they should do their due diligence and ask the necessary questions at the highest levels of the company, otherwise, they might find themselves incompetent for making recommendations on the stock that is not reflective of the company's true value.

Did you think the analysts ignored my advice? That e-mailed report was based on an analyst following up on the content of my e-mail, as I was looking at the documents in front of one of the interviewers. So go figure if the company thinks it is not worth the hassle and expense of going after posting inaccurate information if the SP has been on a downward spiral since 2015 as everybody keeps wondering what is really going on!

Now go back to OBE BB and keep peddling general news items in the hope the stock would gain some momentum. While you are at it, keep sucking on that cool-aid!

makedonka wrote:

Scottie99 wrote: I think you would agree with me that it is a financial crime to post false or misleading statements on social media about a company for the purpose of influencing its stock. Isn't it intriguing that the company is also aware of my postings and can't file a lawsuit if indeed my comments are false or misleading?

Instead they filed a report with a Canadian Securities Regulator, who wanted to set a perjury trap that I could smell a thousand miles away as soon as I honored their invitation. I called their bluff at their office and followed up with e-mail exchanges that would be a scandal if released to the public if not for their confidentiality cover. It is why the company cannot do $hit because they would have to go to court and the veil of confidentiality would have to be removed to address the matter. All I have to do is to release all the documents at my disposal to back up every comment I made on this BB.

I know when someone is being $crewed and the Board in connivance with LKS is $crewing the minority shareholders. I happen to have insider knowledge of what is going on and I am calling them out on it if the Canadian Securities Regulators who are charged with the responsibility of protecting investors are also trying to cover up for the company rather than expose them in the interest of the integrity of the market.

cathychoo wrote: I've been reading Scottie's posts on HSE for a couple of years now and at first thought he was just some nutball.  But at some point, when you see the stock continually getting beaten down, it might be possible that perhaps he's onto something.

 

"I think you would agree with me that it is a financial crime to post false or misleading statements on social media about a company for the purpose of influencing its stock. Isn't it intriguing that the company is also aware of my postings and can't file a lawsuit if indeed my comments are false or misleading?"

No, not "intiguing at all. Just common sense on the companies part.
You give yourself far too much credit to assume a company not going after you is a sign of anything close to accurate.

It is more likely that you're just not worth the hassle and exepense of going after for posting inaccurate information. However, that is not to say that they will not reconsider in the future if you should make it worth their while to bother.

Maybe you're just a figment of your own imagination.lol

******************************************************************

No tirade on my part. Just the facts. There were multiple defandants named in the SLE suit. Kherson was one of them.

By all means, post away to your hearts desire, if you try hard enough, maybe your wish will come true.lol

Perhaps those interested should read your posts on the OBE BB(whatever is left of them) and conclude if there is a pattern (or not) in your message.

Here is an example:

https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=t.obe&threadid=29937937

****************************************************************


"The defamation suit, filed at the Vancouver courthouse on Friday, Feb. 15, complains about a number of messages on Stockhouse, Agoracom and other sites. According to the suit, the messages accused the company of misleading investors about drilling results from its Tesoro property in Peru. Some posts said the company was intentionally drilling away from the mineralized areas, while others stated that management had secretly taken gold from the property. 

The defendants, most of whom are not identified by their real names, include a forum poster named "Kherson." The suit quotes one of his posts, dated Dec. 16, 2012, which read: "If the ore that has been mined, has been processed and the monies made have been pockeedt [sic] by someone other than SLI, then yes Lori and the gang will be standing in front of a judge. Whatever is going on behind the scenes with SLI, we need a Forensic Audit ... ." 

One defendant, only identified as "Rinky," created a post on Jan. 6, 2013, which accused management of wanting "all the gold for themselves." Then, in a message a few days later, he urged shareholders to vote for the dissidents at the then-upcoming AGM. He said the company needed a plan for salvation from the "Wicked Witch of the West." He also said that Ms. McClenahan belongs in jail, "right along side Bernie Madoff," the suit states. 

Another of the defendants, only identified as "jon_doe," created an Oct. 26, 2012, post that read: "I personally would rather have a group of trained monkeys running this company than who we have now. At least they would be honest." 

According to the suit, the posts meant that St. Elias had lied to shareholders and had fraudsters and criminals for management. Moreover, the posts meant that directors and officers were involved in a scheme to misrepresent drill results so they could hide a "stash of gold" from shareholders. The posts also meant that Ms. McClenahan is corrupt, is a criminal and ought to be in jail, the suit states. 

In addition to the allegations against the forum posters, St. Elias complains about an on-line petition that the dissident group set up. The petition, titled "A Call for Investigation Into St. Elias Mines Ltd.," sought a thorough investigation of the company by regulatory bodies. According to the suit, the petition implied that management had engaged in some sort of "egregious conduct," had published inaccurate news and had acted in a conflict of interest, among other things. The suit identifies those behind the petition as the Hastmans and a former St. Elias director, Murry Braucht, who are all defendants. The actual text of the petition, as quoted in the release, did not state exactly what management had done, only saying that the company's conduct warranted investigation. 

The suit also claims that many of the defendants, including the Hastmans and Mr. Braucht, took part in a conspiracy to either damage Ms. McClenahan's reputation or to remove her as chief executive officer. This conspiracy included the intimidation of those who supported management. Among other things, Mr. Braucht allegedly said to one supporter: "I don't get angry. I get even. If you're in with Lori, then you are going down." According to the suit, he also told St. Elias's investor relations man, Donald Ronning, that "if anyone ruins this [the AGM] for me, their day is coming." 

https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=28737378

*****************************************************************************************

Kherson (16)

User Actions  

August 11, 2019 - 07:40 AM 27 Reads 
Post# 30015657

 0

Scottie99

I have been following your posts on the HSE SH board.
It would seem that we both agree with the corruption that is going on behind the scenes with both the OSC and especially the ASC. 
My involvement with the ASC concerning Daylight Energy was actually quite funny. I was the one who clearly pointed out the market manipulation of the share price before the buyout by the Chinese to the ASC, yet I was investigated for illegal trading based on Insider Knowledge!
I do have to ask you though, the information that you have concerning HSE, will it ever be released to the public? 
Kherson