Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

Nemaska Lithium Inc is a Canada based lithium company. It is engaged in exploring and evaluating lithium properties and processing of spodumene into lithium compounds in Quebec, Canada. The company supplies lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate to the lithium battery industry used in electric vehicles, cell phones, tablets, and other consumer products.


GREY:NMKEF - Post by User

Comment by mick1888on Aug 14, 2019 10:01am
110 Views
Post# 30026661

RE:Pallinghurst would be stupid to pay 25 cents a share

RE:Pallinghurst would be stupid to pay 25 cents a share Matt - I hardly think Pallinghurst is stupid. They are a highly successful mining investment company who specialise in long term investments, maximising the potential of the projects they target. They have the resources and knowledge to get the best out of their investments, this being no different. They will have two positions on the board, guiding the project to the best possible outcome. So IMO, if they proceed after their DD, it is unlikely that any of your bullet points will come into play. At worst if any do come to fruition, they will be mitigated. Pallinghurst know exactly what they are dealing with here and see a bargain investment, wish I had got all my stake at 0.25... :-)
materialsgirl wrote: for 2.4 million shares  if they can get 3 million oe 3.5 million shares
for the same cost.
This is just a truism, just math.

They will be highly motivated to buy the shares at a lower price

There are many reasons why they should pay less;

- TSX price lower
- costs will rise even more
- capital costs will be even higher
- production cost will be higher
- longer timeline to start production
- outlook for the price of lithium drops

The excuse list is endless unless there is a potential
competitive bid.
Individual investors are irrelevant when we talk about
$0.6b or more


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>