RE:RE:LP Fault Trends onto Whirlwind Jackhillcrester18 wrote: SuneeDaze wrote: I know we haven't started a field program yet, but there's lots to be optimistic about.
As a couple of us have stated before, the rock lithologies clearly trend from GBR's Dixie project onto RGLD's Whirlwind Jack property. Geophysical maps clearly show the rocks folding in the northwest onto our property.
Also of significance, the Bear Rimini zone, Dixie zones align in a northwesterly trend...yep right through our property...and interestingly on strike with the Madsen mine to the northwest.
Probably most significant is the LP Fault that GBR's own maps show trending from their property to our property. The significance? According to GBR's website,
"
- The LP Fault is interpreted as a major gold mineralization control and hydrothermal fluid conduit during Archean age gold mineralization. The generally 1 kilometre wide area between the LP and North Faults may represent a significant structural dilation zone where gold rich hydrothermal fluids accumulated."
- The new discovery is hosted by a new exploration target, the “LP Fault”, and adjacent lithologies.
Hey guys. Here from the BTU board. I bought into BTU a couple of days ago and its been mentioned on that board that it kakes sense to also take a stake in RGLD whichh I haven't done ... yet.
Guess Im trying to gind a reason to put $ here rather than PAC, morebBTU, or GLD.
thanks
Well, it's a rainy day here on Georgian Bay...
Who knows? Really. They're all exploration plays in which any, all or none may hit. But you want to make money regardless of that. Do in depth dd into management, management, management, share structure and property geology (which you may not ubderstand).
To me, RGLD is superior in each of these facets. I'll do a really quick recap in another post as it'll be too long here...stay tuned.