RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Investors and market as a whole Ha .. yeah, the multiple accounts sound alike and say the same things just rephrased a different way - especially when they pop up and start agreeing and supporting each other.
It's hilarious when they pick false fights with each other just to try and make it sound as if they are different people.
The most disingenuous ones are the ones who make themselves sound legitimate all the while doing a passive aggressive spiel picking at every little thing and spreading FUD as they go along about the company.
Fun times.
WestCoast78 wrote: That was kind of you Trennam to try. I dont login to SH on my mobile, so I get a full tatse of all the mess, when im at the grocery store or wherever. My laptop is very tidy with Iggy-tards
Of course we dont have a CEO....oh wait, the co-ceo and has been with B.L since inception,....right, we'll ingore Mark. And the " I have lots of shares, lets walk it down to $20-$10"...Dude..I dont know what to even say to that.
I'll personally vote for the shorts to start closing, and switch positions. HOw many account do they have on here? Seemingly fire a few up daily. sigh
Trennam wrote: Just as I thought not worth anymore of my time - welcome to the mental iggy mountain.
MNK3240 wrote: Board members are not compensated like CEOs or other executives, so nothing to worry about increased remuneration.
If the size of the Board is small, you can easily convince majority of the Board members to take major decisions like ousting Bruce Linton (which may or may not be a good decision, time will tell) but bigger Board helps you to make better strategic decisions and prevents hasty ones.
For a huge growing company like this, you need strong visionary leadership. Don't be emotional and just take everything for granted for Constellation assuming they know everything. If they knew everything, we would not come 3/4/5th in quarterly revenue this quarter, they may catch up later for sure, that's a different discussion.
Anyway, nothing personal, you need to be wise and thoughtful, just because I have a large position and keep saying good things all the time. We don't manage the company but there is always a room for improvement. thanks
Trennam wrote: Holy cr@p you post a lot of nonsensical musings on here.
Explain why increasing the number of board members and having to pay more in compensation per member just to fill a seat will make the decision making more efficient?
Constellation knows what they are doing. Armchair quarterbacking the decisions of a multi-billion dollar company is hilarious.
MNK3240 wrote: Don't blame the market. $20b dollars company, don't have even a proper CEO. Also the Canopy's Board should be bigger and should consist of at least 10/15 members (instead of having just 4/5 people) so that the resolutions/decisions are taken by the Board are more efficient and effective.
MNK3240 wrote: Seems to be really confused about Canopy. They can't make up their mind. Is it good, is it bad, should they buy or sell or stay away? Seriously, it's weird, everything now is weird about Canopy.
The stock goes up, comes down, stays the same. It's like don't know what to do about it, go up or down.
Man, if you have to bring it down, ok take it down to 20s or 10s and done with it. At least it goes somewhere!
I think both shorts and longs are confused about Canopy's future and potential.