GREY:RNKLF - Post by User
Post by
Symbioticon Sep 02, 2019 10:32pm
117 Views
Post# 30088897
Asymptotic evolution and symptotic evaision
Asymptotic evolution and symptotic evaision Just listening to Peter Schiff going on about Andrew Yang. Schiff has a respectable but imiediate conclusion but he is the buggy whip maker of which he speaks and in defence of it. As far as he is capable of future prediction I see no glaring fault as pertains to gold and such. So I looked into Yang a bit and saw some discussions such as him and Ben Shapiro. Yang is an intelligent sort but his elevator does not go quite to the top and his prescription still produces hierarchical divisions akin to today’s practices. He has Bitcoinish aspirations with pragmatic considerations. If the dollar disappears Bitcoin will lack an index base. By then and if then it will choose index to PMs in probability to its nature or less likely to production as it is still a have and have not concept. The human participants discuss distribution philosophies and justification of them in both an old and new way. Both fail on centralization as both require it for actualization of their objectives. Bitcoin being a non vocal entity at least not from a center contains only the current opinions that exist of it,at large and open to definition and interpretation. Interesting times but the answers available are not complete or comprehensive to an evolutionary standard. They hopefully shall express in a meaningful way on the larger game or the road will be potholed and a bit unerving or at worst fatal. Just opinions as usual, for better or worse.