Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Great Bear Resources Ltd. GTBAF

Great Bear Resources Ltd. is a Vancouver-based gold exploration company focused on advancing its 100% owned Dixie project in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. A significant exploration drill program is currently underway to define the mineralization within a large-scale, high-grade disseminated gold discovery made in 2019, the LP Fault. Additional exploration drilling is also in progress to expand and infill nearby high-grade gold zones, as well as to test new regional targets.


OTCQX:GTBAF - Post by User

Comment by goindeeperon Sep 05, 2019 11:55pm
160 Views
Post# 30100968

RE:Math

RE:Math Total In Situ Value = (volume of deposit)(specific gravity of host rock)(average g/t of deposit)(in situ value of one gram of gold based on purchases of similar deposits)

Make sure your units are consistent i.e. use metres and grams all the way through or you have to include the conversion factors in your calculation.



CdnBadger wrote:
Could someone who knows geo dontje math for me here. I don't know how to work it out. Hypothetically if the entire fault was in fact the strike length and we were getting say 2 grams per ton.(or is there a more accurate conservative number). Like what could the potential of this thing be? In my head it seems massive but just what are we actually looking at here? Even if it was only the 3.5 km combined even that seems pretty big. Can someone help get a grasp on the numbers or explain/send me somewhere so I can do the work myself. Thanks in advance. I don't mind doing some heavy lefting so feel free to point me towards some heavy reading.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>