PINL:GRPOF - Post by User
Comment by
BatteryGuyon Sep 11, 2019 12:06pm
243 Views
Post# 30116648
RE:RE:RE:RE:DINs
RE:RE:RE:RE:DINsWwmeinc - I went back thru a pule of stockhouse and media from TBP before buying in. I was surprised with some of the chatting on this board about what seems to be censoring negative comments. Is there a bit of a muzzle order on the negative comments? That is really too bad, shows a fragile TBP team quite honestly......I've read that a few times now and is concerning.... I feel this SP could slide some more, but someone is accumulating at .30..... My last .27s I dumped at .41 and I still have a pile but I can't say TBP will outperform the bigger players long term..... The Thorne deal was announced in such a way that it seems like a separate venture for TBP in a new lineup related to IBS / IBD. That is promising but there are others going after the IBS market so a $10 million exploratory research venture with a US pharma connection isn't exactly a blockbuster.... why wouldn't Tetra seek to sell there clinical trial services like they claimed they were going to... instead they roll over give away IP to Thorne and hope it ends up in a happy marriage.... I expected an announcement from TBP related to the Health Canada halt of PP01 clinical... if that trial is dead, the real shorter term potential for a DIN is dead or close to it IMO.... I'll be around because this is now more a buyout play than anything.... All the dilution and loading of options and warrants by internal highlights that a quick buyout at $1 range would make them all very rich. Didnt they raise at .30 and .40? After they were .70+ forever? I'm no rookie to the stock market but seems like this one is way more foggy then I was expecting.... have they even remotely indicated how much Hemp Energy Drink they are selling?
wwmeinc wrote: Well,well Hammertown87....the crash of '87 was an eye opener for those who were watching the Dow drop and drop and drop...but I digress...so you think/believe mgmt is here for you and your investment?
Why do you not go and look at their website and tell the board what each of those graph's mean...do you see any detailed explanation to inform shareholders of what is being studies and what still needs to be studied before they "submit"? If vague information is meant to be their strong suit then I would agreed,mgmt is tops here.
They are attending the Bio conf. in Boston today and tomorrow...why do you not ask why they are there if their 'studies' do not have any information available? Maybe they are attending just for "show"????
Every shareholder has their ideal of mgmt's ability and strength to deliver maximum shareholder value...these last 12 months has shown to me that this 'team' is not there yet and unless they have something more than graphs on their webpage...it will be dilution and more dilution for their continued employment. You seem to be content with that. I expect more. GLTA