Falling Knife or chance at a rebirthI think if we vote yes, it will be a falling knife as Amar has more liabilities than assets. He knows our company is valuable, otherwise, he would not be interested. I think at these prices we can do it on our own and that is why I will be voting no. We have little debt and owe Amar very little. Amar is already making money off of us. The only reason why he wants to take our company away from us is because he knows that we generate more money than him and at a 1:40 reverse split, and a falling knife scenario, Amar's option is way less attractive. If it was 1:5 or 1:4, I would vote yes but 1:40 will never go for me. You are practically giving your shares away for free and there is no guarantees after the RTO; shareholders may loose confidence and hence a falling knife. Even if Amar gets 18 million shares post RTO and he sells all of his shares, he becomes rich and we don't get anything and the cycle continues again until the company to amar does another rto and does the same thing. Let's prevent this now and vote no; we could do a 1:5 reverse split bringing down the shares oustanding to about 55 million and do a PP to raise some funds, buy new mining machines, pay off existing debts and keep our current machines running until the lease is over. This is what we should be doing. Tell me if I'm wrong.